Payan v. Tate et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Certain Claims 8 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/21/14. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 MICHAEL J. PAYAN, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. H. TATE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13cv00807 LJO DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS (Document 8) 16 17 Plaintiff Michael J. Payan (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on May 28, 2013. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 21 22 On January 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that certain claims be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections must be 23 filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file objections. 24 25 26 27 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 8, 2014, are adopted in full; 2. This action proceed on the following cognizable claims: (1) retaliation in 4 violation of the First Amendment by Defendants Bingamon, Tate and Vu; and (2) 5 deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth 6 Amendment against Defendants Bingamon, Tate, Vu, Sheisha and Joaquin. 7 8 3. All other claims ARE DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill February 21, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?