Payan v. Tate et al
Filing
83
ORDER Granting Defendants' 82 Request to Screen Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/2/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
MICHAEL J. PAYAN,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
H. TATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:13cv00807 LJO DLB PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO SCREEN COMPLAINT
(Document 82)
16
17
Plaintiff Michael J. Payan (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on May 28, 2013. This action is proceeding on the
19
following cognizable claims: (1) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment by Defendants
20
21
22
Bingamon, Tate and Vu; and (2) deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of
the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Bingamon, Tate, Vu, Shiesha and Joaquin.
Defendants’ May 19, 2015, motion for summary judgment based on exhaustion is
23
pending.
24
25
26
27
28
On August 25, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to amend. The Court also
ordered Defendants, within thirty (30) days of the date of being served with Plaintiff’s amended
complaint, to inform the Court whether they (1) would accept service for the newly-served
Defendants; and (2) would update the pending motion for summary judgment.
1
1
Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on October 19, 2015.
2
On October 30, 2015, Defendants requested relief from the Court’s August 25, 2015,
3
4
5
asking that the Court first screen the amended complaint.
The Court does not always screen complaints after granting leave to amend where certain
Defendants have already appeared. However, given Defendants’ request to do so, the Court will
6
7
8
9
GRANT Defendants’ request for relief and screen the amended complaint prior to requiring any
further action from Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
November 2, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?