Balzarini v. Lewis et al

Filing 51

ORDER STRIKING 48 Plaintiff's Surreply signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/12/2015. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 ST. MICHAEL BALZARINI, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, v. KYLE LEWIS, et al., Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13-cv-00820-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SURREPLY (ECF No. 48) 15 16 Plaintiff St. Michael Balzarini (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 30, 2013. This 18 action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed on July 17, 2014, against 19 Defendants Ulit and Agtarap for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of 20 the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 21 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment to revoke 22 in forma pauperis status filed on October 3, 2014. Plaintiff filed an opposition on November 13, 23 2014, Defendants filed a reply on November 24, 2014, and the motion has been submitted upon 24 the record. Local Rule 230(l). However, on January 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document entitled 25 “Opposition to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” (ECF No. 48.) The Court construes this 26 filing as a surreply. 27 28 No further briefing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a surreply and the Court does not 1 1 desire any further briefing on the motion. Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply is HEREBY 2 STRICKEN from the record and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be addressed in 3 due course. Id. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: /s/ Barbara May 12, 2015 6 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?