Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians v. Yosemite Bank et al

Filing 8

ORDER to relate actions and to reassign Magistrate Judge signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/13/2013. The new case number is 1:13-cv-00831-LJO-MJS.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 THE PICAYUNE RANCHERIA CHUKCHANSI INDIANS, CASE NO. CV F 13-0831 LJO SKO NEW CASE NO. CV F 13-0831 LJO MJS Plaintiffs, 14 ORDER TO RELATE ACTIONS AND TO REASSIGN MAGISTRATE JUDGE vs. 15 16 YOSEMITE BANK, et al., 17 Defendants. ______________________________/ 18 19 Review of the above-captioned action reveals that it is related under this Court’s Local 20 Rule 123 to the action entitled Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi. v. Rabobank, et al., Case 21 No. CV F 13-0609 LJO MJS. The actions involve the same or similar parties, properties, 22 claims, events and/or questions of fact or law. Accordingly, assignment of the actions to the 23 same district judge and magistrate judge will promote convenience, efficiency and economy 24 for the Court and parties. An order relating cases under this Court’s Local Rule 123 merely 25 assigns them to the same district judge and magistrate judge, and no consolidation of cases is 26 effected. 27 On the basis of good cause, this Court ORDERS that the above-captioned action is 28 reassigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng with a new CASE NO. CV F 13-0831 1 1 LJO MJS. All documents shall bear the new CASE NO. CV F 13-0831 LJO MJS and the 2 reassignment to Magistrate Judge Seng. U.S. District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill will remain 3 assigned to this action. 4 5 The proposed intervenor defendant (Lewis Faction) will need to reset its motion to intervene before Magistrate Judge Seng. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 13, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?