Puckett v. Young et al

Filing 29

ORDER REGARDING Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/5/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 DURRELL PUCKETT, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 v. R. YOUNG, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13-cv-00840-BAM (PC) ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 28) Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 16 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second 17 amended complaint, filed on July 21, 2014, against Defendants Grant, Meyers, Young, Jobb, 18 Rodriguez, Slankard and Martinez for excessive force, against Defendants Williams, Munoz, 19 Peterson, Grant and Steers for failure to intervene, and against Defendant Slankard for deliberate 20 indifference to Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement. 21 On January 5, 2014, Defendants filed a “Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with 22 Prejudice.” (ECF No. 28.) Defendants represent that the parties have resolved this case in its 23 entirety and stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 24 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). However, the document is signed electronically for Plaintiff as “/s/ 25 THD for Durrell A. Puckett.” (ECF No. 28, p. 2.) The electronic signature does not comply with 26 Local Rule 131 and Plaintiff has not been authorized to file papers electronically. 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days following service of this order, defense counsel 2 shall scan and file the stipulation for voluntary dismissal, along with the signature page 3 containing the original signatures of Plaintiff and defense counsel. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara January 5, 2015 7 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?