Headspeth v. Page et al

Filing 10

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Show Cause within Thirty Days why this action should not be DISMISSED for Plaintiff's Failure to Obey a Court Order 9 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 08/13/14. (30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CALVIN ANTHONY HEADSPETH,

12

Case No. 1:13-cv-00860-DLB

Plaintiff,

Defendants.

13

(ECF No. 9)

v.

14

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT
ORDER

D. PAGE, et al.,

15
16
17

Plaintiff Calvin Anthony Headspeth (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the

18

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in

19

forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 24, 2014, the Court

20

issued an order finding service of complaint appropriate and provided service documents to

21

complete and return to the Court within thirty days.

22

comply with the order would result the dismissal of this action. More than thirty days has passed

23

and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order.

24

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1.

Plaintiff was warned that the failure to

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff

26

shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order; and

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

2.

The failure to respond to this order or the failure to show cause will result in the

dismissal of this action.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

August 13, 2014

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2