Lear v. Leftler, et al.

Filing 8

ORDER directing Plaintiff to clarify re Dismissal, 7 Letter signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/19/2013. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RODERICK LEAR, CASE No. 1:13-cv-00882-MJS (PC) 13 Plaintiff, 14 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CLARIFY RE DISMISSAL v. (ECF No. 7) 15 16 MICHELLE LEFTLER, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 ________________________________/ 19 Plaintiff Roderick Lear, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis filed this civil rights action on June 12, 2013 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint has not yet been screened by the Court. 22 Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court (ECF No. 7) which appears to seek legal 23 direction regarding voluntarily dismissal of the action. The Court cannot provide Plaintiff 24 with legal advice. 25 Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a 26 court order by filing a notice of dismissal. 27 Plaintiff’s letter to the Court (ECF No. 7) is equivocal. The Court requires clarity 28 as to whether Plaintiff actually wishes to voluntarily dismiss his action. -1- 1 If Plaintiff wishes to dismiss the action, he is directed to file a notice of dismissal 2 clearly stating his intention to do so. Absent such notice, the action shall remain 3 pending. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: ci4d6 7 June 19, 2013 Michael J. Seng /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?