Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file opening brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/25/2014. (Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2014) (Figueroa, O)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

FRESNO DIVISION

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
CHARLOTTE M. ARMSTRONG,

Case No.: 1:13-CV-00895-SAB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
(ECF No. 13)
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

15

Plaintiff Charlotte M. Armstrong is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action

16

appealing the denial of Social Security benefits. On January 16, 2014, the Court issued an order

17

amending the scheduling order and directing Plaintiff to file her opening brief on or before June

18

23, 2014. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief in this action.

19

Based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the scheduling order, IT IS HEREBY

20

ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is to show

21

cause why this action should not be dismissed for her failure to file an opening brief in

22

compliance with the January 16, 2014 amended scheduling order.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 25, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1