Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file opening brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/25/2014. (Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2014) (Figueroa, O)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
CHARLOTTE M. ARMSTRONG,
Case No.: 1:13-CV-00895-SAB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
(ECF No. 13)
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Plaintiff Charlotte M. Armstrong is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action
appealing the denial of Social Security benefits. On January 16, 2014, the Court issued an order
amending the scheduling order and directing Plaintiff to file her opening brief on or before June
23, 2014. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief in this action.
Based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the scheduling order, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is to show
cause why this action should not be dismissed for her failure to file an opening brief in
compliance with the January 16, 2014 amended scheduling order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 25, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?