Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

Order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file opening brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/25/2014. (Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2014) (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) CHARLOTTE M. ARMSTRONG, Case No.: 1:13-CV-00895-SAB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF (ECF No. 13) RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 15 Plaintiff Charlotte M. Armstrong is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action 16 appealing the denial of Social Security benefits. On January 16, 2014, the Court issued an order 17 amending the scheduling order and directing Plaintiff to file her opening brief on or before June 18 23, 2014. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief in this action. 19 Based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the scheduling order, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is to show 21 cause why this action should not be dismissed for her failure to file an opening brief in 22 compliance with the January 16, 2014 amended scheduling order. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?