Torres-Sainz v. Benov

Filing 27

ORDER Directing Respondent to Submit Proposed Order in Compliance With Appellate Court Order of Remand Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/12/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 MARIANO TORRES-SAINZ, 5 Petitioner, 6 v. 7 No. 1:13-cv-00896-LJO-SKO HC ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SUBMIT PROPOSED ORDER IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPELLATE COURT ORDER OF REMAND CRAIG APKER, 8 Respondent. 9 10 On August 5, 2015, Petitioner Mariano Torres-Sainz filed a notice of appeal in the U.S. 11 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concerning this Court’s denial of his petition for writ of 12 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Thereafter, Respondent provided Petitioner a new 13 14 15 administrative hearing in which the good conduct time that was the subject of the petition was restored. Accordingly, Respondent moved for remand to this Court. On March 15, 2017, the 16 Ninth Circuit Court remanded the case with directions to augment the record with the Declaration 17 of DHO Richard Devereaux and to determine whether it shall retain further jurisdiction over the 18 case. See Torres-Sainz v. Apker, Docs. 11 and 13 (Case No. 15-16564). 19 The Ninth Circuit’s having remanded the case to the District Court and the Clerk of Court 20 having reopened the case on the District Court docket, Respondent is hereby DIRECTED to 21 22 23 submit, within thirty (30) days of this order, a proposed order in compliance with the terms of the Ninth Circuit order of remand. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: April 12, 2017 /s/ 27 Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?