Flores vs. County of Fresno
Filing
47
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING Substitution of Attorney signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/16/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1 Gary M. Messing, Bar No. 075363
James W. Henderson, Jr., Bar No. 071170
2 CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP
Attorneys at Law
3 980 9th Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, California 95814
4 Telephone:
916.446.5297
Facsimile:
916.448.5047
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff MANUEL FLORES
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11 MANUEL FLORES,
Case No. 1:13-CV-00902-BAM
12
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION
OF ATTORNEY
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 COUNTY OF FRESNO,
15
Defendant.
16
17
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, subject to approval by the court, Plaintiff
18 MANUEL FLORES substitutes James W. Henderson, Jr., State Bar No. 071170, c/o Messing
19 Adam & Jasmine LLP as counsel for record in place of James W. Henderson, Jr., State Bar No.
20 071170, c/o Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP. Contact information for new counsel is as
21 follows:
22
Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP
23
980 9th Street, Suite 380
24
Sacramento, CA 95814
25
Telephone: (916) 446-5297 / Facsimile: (916) 448-5047
26
Email: jhenderson@majlabor.com
27
28
CARROLL, BURDICK &
MCDONOUGH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
Case No. 1:13-CV-00902-BAM
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
1 I consent to the above substitution.
2
/s/ Manuel Flores
3 Date: 6/9/15
Manuel Flores
4
5 I consent to being substituted.
CARROLL, BURDICK & MCDONOUGH LLP
6
/s/ David Godwin
7 Date: 6/15/15
David Godwin
8
9 I consent to the above substitution.
MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP
10
/s/ James W. Henderson, Jr.
11 Date:4/17/2015
James W. Henderson, Jr.
12
13
14
15
ORDER
The substitution of attorney is hereby approved.
16
17 IT IS SO ORDERED.
18 Dated:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CARROLL, BURDICK &
MCDONOUGH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
June 16, 2015
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?