Coley v. Brazelton et al

Filing 29

ORDER Adopting 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 9 11 19 23 Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/11/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDREW CALVIN COLEY,

12
13
14
15

1:13-cv-00912-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 25.)

vs.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Docs. 9, 11, 19, 23.)

P. D. BRAZELTON, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Andrew Calvin Coley (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

20

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

21

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22

On January 8, 2014, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

23

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 25.) On February 6,

24

2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 28.)

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

26

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

27

including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be

28

supported by the record and proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

2

1.

3
4

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January
8, 2014, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2.

5

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on July 11, 2013,
August 5, 2013, September 25, 2013, and November 7, 2013 are DENIED.

6
7

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

February 11, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
2