Coley v. Brazelton et al
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING Request for Free Copies of All Case Documents 31 ; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint 32 ; ORDER for Clerk to Mail Plaintiff Copy of Complaint Filed June 5, 2013 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/20/14: 30-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint - blank form) (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW CALVIN COLEY,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
P.D. BRAZELTON, et al.,
Defendants.
15
1:13-cv-00912 LJO GSA (PC)
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR FREE
COPIES OF ALL CASE DOCUMENTS
(Doc. 31.)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 32.)
16
30-DAY DEADLINE
17
ORDER FOR CLERK TO MAIL PLAINTIFF
COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED JUNE 5, 2013
(Doc. 1.)
18
19
20
I.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. '
21
22
1983.
On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for free copies of all of his case
23
documents, and on November 19, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file an amended
24
complaint. (Docs. 31, 32.)
25
II.
REQUEST FOR FREE COPIES
26
Plaintiff requests the court to send him copies of all of the documents filed in this case.
27
Plaintiff is advised that the Clerk does not ordinarily provide free copies of case documents to
28
1
1
parties. The Clerk charges $.50 per page for copies of documents. See 28 U.S.C. ' 1914(a).
2
Copies of up to twenty pages may be made by the Clerk's Office at this Court upon written
3
4
5
6
7
8
request and prepayment of the copy fees. The fact that the Court has granted leave for Plaintiff to
proceed in forma pauperis does not entitled him to free copies of documents from the Court.
Under 28 U.S.C. ' 2250, the Clerk is not required to furnish copies without cost to an indigent
petitioner except by order of the judge. Plaintiff was advised in this court’s First Informational
Order issued on June 6, 2013, that “[t]he Clerk's Office does not provide copies of documents to
parties.” (First Informational Order, Doc. 3 at 2.)
Plaintiff asserts that his personal property, including legal documents pertaining to this
9
10
11
case, was lost by prison officials. In this instance, and in light of the fact that the court has
ordered Plaintiff to amend the Complaint, the Court shall make a one-time exception and provide
Plaintiff with a free copy of his Complaint. However, any other requests for copies must be
12
accompanied by pre-payment of copy costs and a sufficiently-large self-addressed envelope
13
affixed with sufficient postage to return the copies to Plaintiff.
14
III.
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE TO THE COURT
15
In his request for copies, Plaintiff notifies the court that he fears for his safety because he
16
17
18
19
20
has an enemy at the prison, and he has made four requests to prison officials for transfer to
another facility. The court acknowledges receipt of Plaintiff’s notice. However, Plaintiff has not
requested specific action by the court or described conditions of imminent danger requiring
immediate action.
IV.
21
22
23
24
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Plaintiff requests an extension of time to file a First Amended Complaint, pursuant to the
court’s order of October 30, 2014. Good cause having been presented to the court, the extension
of time shall be granted.
V.
CONCLUSION
25
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
27
Plaintiff’s request for free copies of all of his case documents is DENIED;
///
28
2
1
2.
service of this order in which to file a First Amended Complaint, pursuant to the
2
court’s order of October 30, 2014; and
3
4
3.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of his Complaint filed on June 5,
2013 (Doc. 1).
5
6
Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time until thirty (30) days from the date of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
November 20, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?