Estrada v. Tassey et al
Filing
150
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 146 Motion to Compel Responses from Defendants as PREMATURE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/21/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ESTRADA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
GIPSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13cv00919 LJO DLB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES
FROM DEFENDANTS AS PREMATURE
(Document 146)
20
Plaintiff David Estrada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
21
in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on August 7, 2013. Pursuant to
22
the Court’s screening order and Plaintiff’s notice of willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims,
23
this action is proceeding against (1) Defendants Gipson and Espinosa for retaliation in violation of the
24
First Amendment; and (2) Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and Cavazos for violation of the
25
Eighth Amendment.
26
27
28
1
1
Discovery closed on December 15, 2014.
2
3
4
On December 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to his Request for
Production of Documents, Set Three, served on Defendants.1 Defendants did not file an opposition
and the Court deems the matter suitable for decision pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).
5
DISCUSSION
6
According to Plaintiff’s motion and attached exhibits, he served Requests for Production of
7
Documents, Set Three, on Defendants on November 25, 2014. Plaintiff’s motion, however, was
8
signed on December 9, 2014, long before Defendants’ responses were due.
9
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to compel is DENIED as premature.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
13
/s/ Dennis
January 21, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L. Beck
1
The motion is sealed, but the Court sees no reason to seal this order.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?