Estrada v. Tassey et al
Filing
176
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 156 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 03/03/15. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ESTRADA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
TASSEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13cv00919 DLB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
(Document 156)
Plaintiff David Estrada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on August 7, 2013. Pursuant to
the Court’s screening order and Plaintiff’s notice of willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims,
this action is proceeding against (1) Defendants Gipson and Espinosa for retaliation in violation of the
First Amendment; and (2) Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and Cavazos for violation of the
Eighth Amendment.
Pursuant to the July 17, 2014, Discovery and Scheduling Order, discovery closed on December
15, 2014.
25
26
27
28
1
1
2
On January 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions, contending that Defendants had
failed to provide responses as ordered by the Court on December 29, 2014.1
3
Although Defendants did not oppose the motion, Plaintiff stated in a subsequent motion that he
4
received Defendants’ supplemental responses on February 6, 2015.
5
Plaintiff’s motion is therefore moot and is DENIED.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
/s/ Dennis
March 3, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
Plaintiff indicates that the date of the Court’s order regarding his motion to compel was December 25, 2014. However,
although the order was signed on December 25, 2014, it was not docketed until December 29, 2014. Therefore,
Defendants’ time for compliance with the order did not begin to run until December 29, 2014, when they received notice of
the order through CM/ECF. Local Rule 135(a).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?