Estrada v. Tassey et al

Filing 176

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 156 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 03/03/15. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ESTRADA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 TASSEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13cv00919 DLB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (Document 156) Plaintiff David Estrada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on August 7, 2013. Pursuant to the Court’s screening order and Plaintiff’s notice of willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims, this action is proceeding against (1) Defendants Gipson and Espinosa for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; and (2) Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and Cavazos for violation of the Eighth Amendment. Pursuant to the July 17, 2014, Discovery and Scheduling Order, discovery closed on December 15, 2014. 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 On January 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions, contending that Defendants had failed to provide responses as ordered by the Court on December 29, 2014.1 3 Although Defendants did not oppose the motion, Plaintiff stated in a subsequent motion that he 4 received Defendants’ supplemental responses on February 6, 2015. 5 Plaintiff’s motion is therefore moot and is DENIED. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 /s/ Dennis March 3, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 28 Plaintiff indicates that the date of the Court’s order regarding his motion to compel was December 25, 2014. However, although the order was signed on December 25, 2014, it was not docketed until December 29, 2014. Therefore, Defendants’ time for compliance with the order did not begin to run until December 29, 2014, when they received notice of the order through CM/ECF. Local Rule 135(a). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?