Estrada v. Tassey et al
Filing
200
ORDER DENYING 199 Motion for Copy of Transcripts, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/03/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
DAVID ESTRADA,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
GIPSON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:13cv00919 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS
(Document 199)
16
17
Plaintiff David Estrada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
Pauperis in this this civil action. Plaintiff appealed this Court’s grant of summary judgment on
19
November 4, 2015.
20
21
22
On November 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that “a transcript of the entire
record at Government’s expense be forwarded” to the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 199, at 2.
A litigant who has been granted in forma pauperis status may move to have transcripts
23
produced at government expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f); McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d
24
25
26
27
1500, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991) (subsequent history omitted).
The Court need not analyze the issue further, however. This action did not proceed to
trial, and therefore there are no transcripts that could be prepared.
28
1
1
2
3
Moreover, Plaintiff is notified that the appellate court has access to the Court’s file in this
case, and will request any necessary documents that are in the record directly from this Court.
Plaintiff’s motion is therefore DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
December 3, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?