Estrada v. Tassey et al
Filing
54
ORDER DISREGARDING 49 Plaintiff's Document Entitled "Changed Pleading," signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/26/2013. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
DAVID ESTRADA,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
GIPSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:13cv00919 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
DOCUMENT ENTITLED “CHANGED
PLEADING”
(Document 49)
16
17
Plaintiff David Estrada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this this civil action. Plaintiff filed this action on June 17, 2013. On August 8, 2013,
19
Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. This action is proceeding on the following claims:
20
21
22
(1) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Defendants Gipson and Espinosa; and
(2) violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and
Cavazos.
23
Plaintiff returned service documents and the United States Marshall was directed to serve
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and Cavazos on October 11, 2013.
On December 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a document entitled, “Changed Pleading.”
Plaintiff refers to his numerous motions for injunctive relief, but it is unclear whether this
pleading is a motion. It is also unclear what document Plaintiff is attempting to “change.”
1
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s “Changed Pleading” is DISREGARDED.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
/s/ Dennis
December 26, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
7
9b0hied
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?