Estrada v. Tassey et al

Filing 54

ORDER DISREGARDING 49 Plaintiff's Document Entitled "Changed Pleading," signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/26/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 DAVID ESTRADA, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. GIPSON, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13cv00919 LJO DLB PC ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S DOCUMENT ENTITLED “CHANGED PLEADING” (Document 49) 16 17 Plaintiff David Estrada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this this civil action. Plaintiff filed this action on June 17, 2013. On August 8, 2013, 19 Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. This action is proceeding on the following claims: 20 21 22 (1) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Defendants Gipson and Espinosa; and (2) violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and Cavazos. 23 Plaintiff returned service documents and the United States Marshall was directed to serve 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants Gipson, Espinosa, Lambert and Cavazos on October 11, 2013. On December 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a document entitled, “Changed Pleading.” Plaintiff refers to his numerous motions for injunctive relief, but it is unclear whether this pleading is a motion. It is also unclear what document Plaintiff is attempting to “change.” 1 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s “Changed Pleading” is DISREGARDED. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 /s/ Dennis December 26, 2013 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 7 9b0hied 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?