Ortiz v. Avenal State Prison et al

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 26 Request to Extend the Dispositive Motion Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/4/15. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ENRIQUE ORTIZ,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

v.
AVENAL STATE PRISON, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00959-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST
TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION
DEADLINE
[ECF No. 26]

Plaintiff Enrique Ortiz is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

16

On June 3, 2015, Defendant Marmolejo filed a motion to extend the dispositive motion

17

deadline. Because the Court finds that no prejudice will result to Plaintiff by a thirty day extension of

18

the dispositive motion deadline, the Court elects to resolve the motion without waiting for Plaintiff to

19

file a response. Local Rule 230(l).

20

Good cause having been presented to the Court based on defense counsel’s representation that

21

discovery has been conducted and additional time is necessary to review the deposition transcript and

22

other documents to file a motion for summary judgment.

23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 4, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1