Cleveland-Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 7

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time 6 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/30/2013. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANA CLEVELAND-HAYES, Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 15 ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00962 - JLT ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) AN EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) ) 16 Ana Cleveland-Hayes (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review the administrative decision denying her 17 18 application for Social Security benefits. (Doc. 1). Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, 19 the Court screened her complaint and approved it for service on July 1, 2013. (Doc. 3). In addition, the 20 Court issued Social Security Case Documents and ordered Plaintiff to complete and submit to the Court 21 the “Notice of Submission of Documents in Social Security Appeal Form.” Id. at 3. On July 29, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to complete and return the 22 23 documents to the Court, asserting that she has been unable to complete the information as she is away 24 from home with her husband who is undergoing medical treatments. (Doc. 6). In addition, Plaintiff 25 asserts she is requesting an extension because she is “in the process of retaining an attorney and he 26 needs time to review [her] case.” Id. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED; 3 2. Plaintiff SHALL complete and return the “Notice of Submission of Documents in Social Security Appeal Form” on or before September 13, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 30, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?