James v. Granger

Filing 36

STIPULATED Joint Request For Continuance of Trial and Related Dates and ORDER Thereon, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/19/2015. (1. Jury Trial CONTINUED to 4/26/2016, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. 2. Discovery in this matter may continue pending the entry of a new discovery cut-off date. 3. The parties shall meet and confer, and thereafter submit a joint scheduling report to the Court within two calendar weeks of the Courts entry of this stipulated order for the determination of new dates, including discovery and motion practice deadlines. 4. The parties shall submit to the Courts entry of the joint scheduling report as its order or will otherwise attend a further joint scheduling conference as directed by the Court after submission of that report.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Leonard C. Herr, #081896 Ron Statler, #234277 HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP Attorneys at Law 100 Willow Plaza, Suite 300 Visalia, California 93291 Telephone: (559) 636-0200 Email: lherr@dhlaw.net Attorneys for Plaintiff: SCOTT R. JAMES 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 SCOTT R. JAMES, 12 13 14 15 CASE NO.: 1:13-cv-00983-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY GRANGER, an individual, Defendant. STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES AND ORDER THEREON Trial Date: October 20, 2015 16 17 The parties, by and through their counsel, agree and jointly request that 18 this Court enter an order continuing the trial date for not less than six months, 19 and requesting a further scheduling conference to set new dates upon the Court’s 20 identification of the new trial date. 21 RECITALS 22 WHEREAS, trial in this matter is set for October 20, 2015; and, 23 WHEREAS, discovery cut-off in this matter is March 9, 2015; and, 24 WHEREAS, most discovery, particularly Defendant’s deposition, was delayed 25 until this new year to allow Defendant to tend to her health and the health of her 26 child; and, 27 WHEREAS, this discovery was not delayed by dilatory or otherwise 28 improper conduct by either party or their counsel, but was in truth necessitated by Law Offices of HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP Attorneys at Law 100 Willow Plaza Suite 300 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 636-0200 1 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES AND ORDER THEREON 1 the medical needs of a party; and, 2 3 WHEREAS, Counsel for both parties agree to a six-month continuance of the matter to allow for a proper effort at discovery; then, 4 The parties hereby agree to the following: 5 STIPULATION 6 7 1. thereafter as the Court determines to be proper. 8 9 Trial in this matter is continued until April 26, 2016 or such time 2. Discovery in this matter may continue pending the entry of a new discovery cut-off date. 10 3. The parties shall meet and confer, and thereafter submit a joint 11 scheduling report to the Court within two calendar weeks of the Court’s entry of 12 this stipulated order for the determination of new dates, including discovery and 13 motion practice deadlines. 14 4. The parties shall either submit to the Court’s entry of the joint 15 scheduling report as its order or will otherwise attend a further joint scheduling 16 conference as directed by the Court. 17 Dated: February 18, 2015 18 KAMALA D. HARRIS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA By: /s/ Catherine Woodbridge Guess Catherine Woodbridge Guess Attorneys for Defendant KIMBERLY GRANGER 19 20 21 22 DATED: February 18, 2015 23 HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP By: /s/ Leonard C. Herr LEONARD C. HERR Attorneys for Plaintiff SCOTT R. JAMES 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Law Offices of HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP Attorneys at Law 100 Willow Plaza Suite 300 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 636-0200 2 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES AND ORDER THEREON 1 ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL ON STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES 2 3 The Court, after considering the stipulation of the parties and the reason therefore does hereby order: 4 1. Trial in this matter is continued until April 26, 2016. 5 2. Discovery in this matter may continue pending the entry of a new 6 discovery cut-off date. 7 3. The parties shall meet and confer, and thereafter submit a joint 8 scheduling report to the Court within two calendar weeks of the Court’s entry of 9 this stipulated order for the determination of new dates, including discovery and 10 motion practice deadlines. 11 4. The parties shall submit to the Court’s entry of the joint scheduling 12 report as its order or will otherwise attend a further joint scheduling conference as 13 directed by the Court after submission of that report. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 19, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Law Offices of HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP Attorneys at Law 100 Willow Plaza Suite 300 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 636-0200 3 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?