Pacific Marine Center, Inc. et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Filing
53
Stipulation and Order re discovery cut off and amendment of Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/6/2015. (Non Expert Discovery due by 10/26/2015; Expert Disclosure due by 10/30/2015; Expert Discovery due by 11/12/2015 ; Dispositive Motions filed by 11/16/2015; Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 11/16/2015; Pretrial Conference set for 1/27/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Trial set for 3/22/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii )(Rosales, O)
Bruce T. Smyth- State Bar No. 89171
CHARLSTON, REVICH & WOLLITZ LLP
2 1925 Century Park East, Suite 1250
Los Angeles, California 90067-2746
3 Tel: (310) 551-7055 • Fax: (310) 203-9321
1
4
5
Attorneys for Defendant,
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PACIFIC MARINE CENTER, INC., a
California corporation, and SONA
12 VARTANIAN, an individual,
11
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
Case No. 1:13-CV-00992-AWI-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND
AMENDMENT OF SCHEDULING
ORDER
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
16 Pennsylvania corporation, and DOES
1 through 10, inclusive,
15
17
Defendants.
18
19
WHEREAS, Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
20
21
(“Philadelphia”) and Plaintiffs Sona Vartanian and Pacific Marine Center, Inc.
22
(“Plaintiffs”) have completed or will complete almost all of the deposition and
23
document discovery in this matter by the current discovery cut-off of October 15,
24
2015;
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs just identified two witnesses not previously listed in
26
interrogatory responses whose depositions Philadelphia would like to take along
27
with production of documents, one of whom Plaintiffs have stated that they intend
28
to waive the attorney-client privilege;
{00113745.DOCX 1}
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
WHEREAS, the current schedule of disclosure of expert testimony allows
1
2
only four days from the date of the initial disclosure for the parties to provide
3
supplemental disclosure of experts based upon the initial disclosure and Plaintiffs
4
and Philadelphia would like more time to obtain and designate supplemental
5
experts based upon the initial disclosure of experts of the opposing party;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Philadelphia desire to extend the time for non-
6
7
expert discovery and to continue the dates of the deadlines for disclosure of experts,
8
dispositive and non-dispositive motions;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiffs and
9
10
Philadelphia, by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
1.
11
12
15, 2015 to October 30, 2015;
2.
13
14
3.
The deadline for supplemental disclosure of expert witnesses shall be
continued from October 30, 2015 to November 30, 2015;
4.
17
18
The deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses shall be extended from
October 26, 2015 to November 13, 2015;
15
16
The deadline for non-expert discovery shall be extended from October
The deadline for the expert discovery cut-off shall be moved from
November 13, 2015 to December 18, 2015;
5.
19
The deadline for filing non-dispositive motions shall be extended from
20
November 16, 2015 to December 16, 2015, with a hearing date of January 19,
21
2016;
22
23
24
25
26
6.
The deadline for dispositive motions shall be extended from November
15, 2015 to December 16, 2015, with a hearing date of January 19, 2016;
7.
The pre-trial conference shall be continued from January 27, 2016 to
February 10, 2016, or such other date as is convenient on the Court’s schedule;
8.
Trial shall be set at the currently scheduled date of March 22, 2016 or,
27
pursuant to the preference of the parties, some date in April or May, 2016
28
convenient to the Court’s schedule.
{00113745.DOCX 1}
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2
Dated: September __, 2015
THE REICH LAW FIRM
3
By:
4
Jeff Reich
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pacific Marine
Center, Inc. and Sona Vartanian
5
6
7
8
Dated: September __, 2015
CHARLSTON, REVICH & WOLLITZ LLP
9
By:
/s/ Bruce T. Smyth
Bruce T. Smyth
Attorneys for Defendant Philadelphia
Indemnity Insurance Company
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{00113745.DOCX 1}
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
ORDER
1
2
As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that this is the parties’ fourth
3
stipulation and request to reset the trial date. (Docs. 16; 32; 39; 44. See also Docs.
4
9; 17; 33; 40; 45.) To move this case to trial before the Honorable Anthony W.
5
Ishii, the non-dispositive and dispositive motion deadlines, pre-trial conference, and
6
trial dates shall remain as set in the Court’s May 8, 2015, scheduling order.
7
(Doc. 40.) Based on the parties’ stipulation, however, the Court will modify the
8
July 30, 2015, scheduling order to grant the parties an extension of time to complete
9
expert discovery, and to file dispositive and non-dispositive motions.
Accordingly, discovery deadlines and motion filing deadlines are set as
10
11
follows:
12
Non Expert Discovery Cutoff: October 26, 2015.
13
Expert Disclosure: October 30, 2015.
14
Supplemental Expert Disclosure: November 5, 2015.
15
Expert Discovery cutoff: November 12, 2015.
16
Non Dispositive Motions:
17
Filing: November 16, 2015.
18
Hearing: December 16, 2015.
Dispositive Motions:
19
20
Filing: November 16, 2015.
21
Hearing: December 21, 2015.
22
Pre-Trial Conference: January 27, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., Ctrm. 2.
23
Trial: March 22, 2016, at 8:30 a.m., in Ctrm. 2.
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 6, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
{00113745.DOCX 1}
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?