McCoy v. Cacciola et al
Filing
22
NOTICE and ORDER Finding That Appeal Was NOT Taken in Good Faith, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/30/2014. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
LAKEITH L. MCCOY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 1:13-cv-00995-LJO-SKO PC
Appeal No. 14-15163
NOTICE AND ORDER FINDING THAT
APPEAL WAS NOT TAKEN IN GOOD
FAITH
v.
S. CACCIOLA, et al.,
(Docs. 18 and 21)
14
15
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
16
17
Plaintiff LaKeith L. McCoy, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 28, 2013. On January 14, 2014, the
19 Court denied Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal
20 on January 27, 2014, and on January 29, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
21 Circuit referred the matter to the district court for a determination whether the appeal is frivolous
22 or taken in bad faith. Fed. R. App. 24(a)(3)(A).
23
An appeal is taken in good faith if the appellant seeks review of any issue that is not
24 frivolous. Gardner v. Pogue, 558 F.2d 548, 550-51 (9th Cir. 1977) (States, 369 U.S. 438, 445, 82
25 S.Ct. 917 (1962)) (quotation marks omitted); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d
26 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (if at least one issue or claim is non-frivolous, the appeal must proceed
27 in forma pauperis as a whole). In this instance, Plaintiff is citing Coppedge v. United challenging
28 the determination that he is not entitled to preliminary injunctive relief. Plaintiff failed to identify
1 any specific issues being appealed; and the Court can discern no basis for Plaintiff’s appeal, other
2 than his mere disagreement with the ruling, which does not suffice to demonstrate a good faith
3 basis for the appeal.
4
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
5
1.
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A), the Court finds that the appeal was not
6 taken in good faith; and
7
2.
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4)(B), the Clerk of the Court shall serve this
8 order on Plaintiff and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
January 30, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?