Moore v. Singh et al

Filing 11

Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/27/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

RONALD MOORE,

) No. 1:13-cv-01005-LJO-MJS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
Plaintiff,
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
SUKHWINDER S. SINGH dba SUKI’S
)
)
AUTO/SHOP GAS; NEENA SINGH aka
JATINDER SINGH; SUKHWINDER SINGH, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1
2
3
4
5
6

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Ronald Moore, by and through
his attorney, and Defendants Sukhwinder S. Singh, individually and dba Suki’s Auto/Shop Gas;
and Neena Singh aka Jatinder Singh; who are self-represented, the parties to this action, that
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Dated: September 27, 2013

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

7
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

8
9
10
11

Dated: September 27, 2013

/s/ Neena Singh
Neena Singh aka Jatinder Singh
Defendant in Pro Per

Dated: September 27, 2013

/s/ Sukhwinder Singh
Sukhwinder Singh, individually and dba
Suki’s Auto/Shop Gas
Defendant in Pro Per

12
13
14
15
16
17

I attest that the original signatures of the persons whose electronic signatures are shown above
are maintained by me, and that their concurrence in the filing of this document and attribution
of their signature was obtained.

18
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for
Plaintiff, Ronald Moore

19
20

ORDER

21

The parties having so stipulated,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

23

Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The clerk is directed to close this

24

action.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 27, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2