Moore v. Singh et al
Filing
11
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/27/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
E-mail: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
RONALD MOORE,
) No. 1:13-cv-01005-LJO-MJS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
Plaintiff,
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
SUKHWINDER S. SINGH dba SUKI’S
)
)
AUTO/SHOP GAS; NEENA SINGH aka
JATINDER SINGH; SUKHWINDER SINGH, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Ronald Moore, by and through
his attorney, and Defendants Sukhwinder S. Singh, individually and dba Suki’s Auto/Shop Gas;
and Neena Singh aka Jatinder Singh; who are self-represented, the parties to this action, that
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Dated: September 27, 2013
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
7
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
8
9
10
11
Dated: September 27, 2013
/s/ Neena Singh
Neena Singh aka Jatinder Singh
Defendant in Pro Per
Dated: September 27, 2013
/s/ Sukhwinder Singh
Sukhwinder Singh, individually and dba
Suki’s Auto/Shop Gas
Defendant in Pro Per
12
13
14
15
16
17
I attest that the original signatures of the persons whose electronic signatures are shown above
are maintained by me, and that their concurrence in the filing of this document and attribution
of their signature was obtained.
18
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for
Plaintiff, Ronald Moore
19
20
ORDER
21
The parties having so stipulated,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
23
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The clerk is directed to close this
24
action.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
September 27, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?