Edwards v. Desfosses, et al.

Filing 105

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Remove Inmate Michael Hunter From Witness List 103 ; ORDER VACATING Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Directing the Production of Inmate Michael Hunter for Trial 72 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/18/16. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 STEVEN EDWARDS, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No. 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO REMOVE INMATE MICHAEL HUNTER FROM WITNESS LIST v. A. DESFOSSES, et al., (ECF NO. 103) 17 Defendants. 19 ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM DIRECTING THE PRODUCTION OF INMATE MICHAEL HUNTER FOR TRIAL 20 (ECF NO. 72) 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 This matter is set for jury trial on March 29, 2016, and the Court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum commanding the production of inmate Michael Hunter to the courthouse on March 29, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. On March 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request to remove inmate Michael Hunter from the witness list. Plaintiff’s motion was filed after the Court’s order denying inmate Hunter’s motion to quash the subpoena. (ECF No. 100.) Plaintiff requests the Court to “provide an order letting inmate Hunter know that the plaintiff no longer seeks him as a 28 1 1 witness in this matter.” (ECF No. 103.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request is GRANTED. Inmate Michael Hunter, CDCR No. 2 3 C-83600, is no longer needed by the Court in these proceedings, and the writ of habeas corpus ad 4 testificandum as to this inmate is HEREBY VACATED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to serve 5 a copy of this order on the CDCR Transportation Office. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: March 18, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?