Edwards v. Desfosses, et al.
Filing
105
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Remove Inmate Michael Hunter From Witness List 103 ; ORDER VACATING Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Directing the Production of Inmate Michael Hunter for Trial 72 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/18/16. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
STEVEN EDWARDS,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
Case No. 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO REMOVE INMATE
MICHAEL HUNTER FROM WITNESS
LIST
v.
A. DESFOSSES, et al.,
(ECF NO. 103)
17
Defendants.
19
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
DIRECTING THE PRODUCTION OF
INMATE MICHAEL HUNTER FOR TRIAL
20
(ECF NO. 72)
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
This matter is set for jury trial on March 29, 2016, and the Court issued a writ of habeas
corpus ad testificandum commanding the production of inmate Michael Hunter to the courthouse
on March 29, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. On March 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request to remove inmate
Michael Hunter from the witness list. Plaintiff’s motion was filed after the Court’s order
denying inmate Hunter’s motion to quash the subpoena. (ECF No. 100.) Plaintiff requests the
Court to “provide an order letting inmate Hunter know that the plaintiff no longer seeks him as a
28
1
1 witness in this matter.” (ECF No. 103.)
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request is GRANTED. Inmate Michael Hunter, CDCR No.
2
3 C-83600, is no longer needed by the Court in these proceedings, and the writ of habeas corpus ad
4 testificandum as to this inmate is HEREBY VACATED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to serve
5 a copy of this order on the CDCR Transportation Office.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
March 18, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?