Edwards v. Desfosses, et al.
Filing
112
ORDER denying Plaintiff's request for production of Video Recording signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/24/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEVEN R. EDWARDS,
14
15
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF
VIDEO RECORDING
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC
v.
A. DESFOSSES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff filed a motion in limine seeking to compel Defendants to produce a video
18 recording of the front entrance of the A-Yard Program Office at Pleasant Valley State Prison on
19 July 17, 2012. (ECF No. 68.)
Defendants opposed the motion on the grounds that the video
20 does not exist, and that Plaintiff did not timely move to compel the production of the video
21 recording before the close of discovery, which was April 10, 2015. (ECF No. 80 at 3.)
On
22 March 16, 2016, the Court issued its order regarding the parties’ motions in limine but reserved
23 its ruling of Plaintiff’s motion to produce the video recording until the Court received a
24 declaration regarding the existence of the video recording at issue. (ECF No. 97 at 4.)
25
On March 24, 2016, Defendants filed with the Court the declaration of K. Geringer, the
26 Litigation Coordinator at Pleasant Valley State Prison. (ECF No. 111.)
The declaration
27 establishes that K. Geringer researched the existence of video recordings of A-Yard at Pleasant
28 Valley State Prison and the A-Yard Program Office made on July 17, 2012. No video recordings
1
1 of A-Yard at Pleasant Valley State Prison and the A-Yard Program Office were made on July 17,
2 2012, because no video cameras captured images in those areas. (Geringer Decl. ¶ 2.)
Because a video recording of the A-Yard Program Office at Pleasant Valley State Prison
3
4 on July 17, 2012, does not exist, the Court cannot compel the production of it. Plaintiff’s motion
5 for the production of the video recording of the A-Yard Program Office at Pleasant Valley State
6 Prison on July 17, 2012, is therefore DENIED.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
March 24, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?