Edwards v. Desfosses, et al.

Filing 41

ORDER assigning case to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/16/2015. New Case Number is 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN R. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-01013-AWI-SAB-PC ORDER ASSIGNING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE v. A. DESFOSSE, et al., New Case Number: 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On July 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a consent to proceed before a magistrate judge (ECF 19 NO. 5.) On September 10, 2015, Defendants Desfosse, Saldivar, Verbeek and Zaccagnini filed a 20 consent to proceed before a magistrate judge (ECF No. 36.) Because all parties to this action 21 have voluntarily consented to have U.S. Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone conduct any and all 22 further proceedings in this case, reassignment of this matter is appropriate. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This action is assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone for all 25 purposes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), to conduct any and all further 26 proceedings in the case, including the trial and entry of final judgment; 27 28 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this case in its entirety to U.S. Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone; and 1 1 3. The new case number shall be 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC, and all future pleadings 2 and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties are advised that use of 3 an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a delay of documents 4 being processed and copies thereof being incorrectly distributed and received by 5 the appropriate judicial officer. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: October 16, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?