Edwards v. Desfosses, et al.

Filing 99

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Pretrial Motions 91 , 92 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/16/16. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 STEVEN EDWARDS, 6 Case No. 1:13-cv-01013-SAB-PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S PRETRIAL MOTIONS v. 7 (ECF NOs. 91, 92) 8 A. DESFOSSES, et al., Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff Steven Edwards is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 11 12 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 14, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an order directing Defendants to 13 14 provide information to Plaintiff regarding prior lawsuits and prisoner grievances filed against 15 Defendants. Plaintiff also filed a motion seeking the issuance of a subpoena for Dr. Berard. On 16 March 10, 2016, an order was entered, denying Plaintiff’s request for the issuance of a subpoena 17 for Dr. Berard. (ECF No. 83.) On March 16, 2016, an order was entered, ruling on the parties’ 18 motions in limine. (ECF No. 97.) Plaintiff’s request to introduce evidence of prior lawsuits or 19 prison grievances filed against Defendants was denied in that order. (Id. at 6:14.) For the 20 reasons noted in the prior orders on the motion in limine and the additional independent basis 21 that the Plaintiff did not seek the compelled production during the discovery phase, Plaintiff’s 22 motion is DENIED. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: March 16, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?