Chavez v. Access Capital Services, Inc.

Filing 3

ORDER Granting IFP re 2 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/16/2013. (Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EVELYN CHAVEZ,

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15
16

13-cv-1037 AWI-GSA

ACCESS CAPITOL SERVICES, INC,

ORDER GRANTING IFP

Defendant.
(Doc. 2)

17
18

Plaintiff Evelyn Chavez, appearing pro se, filed the instant complaint on July 5, 2013.

19

(Doc. 1). Also on July 5, 2013, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

20

(Doc. 2). A review of the application reveals that Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis

21

and her application is therefore GRANTED.

22
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court must conduct an initial review of all pro se
23
24

complaints for sufficiency to state a claim. The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof

25

if the court determines that the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim

26

upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from

27

such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the court determines that the complaint fails to state a

28
1

1

claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent that the deficiencies of the complaint can be

2

cured by amendment. Plaintiff is advised that her complaint will be screened in due course.

3
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

8

July 16, 2013

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10

DEAC_Signature-END:

6i0kij8d

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2