A.A. et al v. Clovis Unified School District et al

Filing 95

ORDER SETTING OUT SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/10/2017. (Kusamura, W)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

A.A. and L.A. on behalf of A.A., Jr.,

7
8
9
10
11
12

Plaintiffs,

ORDER SETTING OUT SCHEDULE
FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING

v.
CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
CLOVIS SELPA, MARY BASS in her
personal and official capacities as SELPA
ADMINISTRATOR and DIRECTOR of
SPECIAL EDUCATION for CLOVIS USD
and DOES 1-10,

13
14

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1043 AWI MJS

(Doc. 88)

Defendants.
Defendants have made a motion to exclude evidence and to disqualify Plaintiffs’ counsel.

15

Doc. 88. After the filing of the reply, Plaintiffs asked for leave to file a surreply which Defendants

16

opposed. Docs. 93 and 94. Review of the briefing shows that the discussion concerning the

17

legality/illegality of recordings discussed only California state law and not federal law.

18

Additionally, there was no discussion of whether Plaintiffs could vicariously consent to the

19

recordings on behalf of their child in this circumstance. Resolution of the motion requires analysis

20

of both these issues. Thus, the request to file a surreply is granted and both parties are ordered to

21

provide additional briefing on a simultaneous schedule. Both parties are directed to file

22

supplemental briefs by 4:00 PM on January 25, 2017. Both parties are directed to file

23

supplemental replies to the supplemental briefs by 4:00 PM on February 3, 2017.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2017
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE