Rocha v. Merced County Sheriff's Department
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/11/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
10
Case No.1:13 cv 01047 GSA PC
JASON J. ROCHA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
vs.
13
MERCED CO. SHERIFF’S DEPT., ET AL.,
14
Defendants
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff is a former Merced County Jail inmate proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
By order filed November 5, 2014, the operative complaint was dismissed for failure to
state a claim. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, and directed to do so
within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
In the November 5, 2014, order the Court informed Plaintiff of the deficiencies in his
complaint, and dismissed the complaint on the ground that Plaintiff had failed to state a claim
24
upon which relief could be granted. Because Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, the
25
Court dismisses the claims made in the original complaint with prejudice for failure to state a
26
federal claim upon which the court could grant relief. See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F. 2d 1446, 1448
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
(9th Cir. 1987) (prisoner must be given notice of deficiencies and opportunity to amend prior to
dismissing for failure to state a claim).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to state
a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
/s/ Gary S. Austin
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
December 11, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?