Jackson et al v. State of California et al

Filing 102

Order directing parties to file supplemental briefing, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/30/2015. (Supplemental Briefing Deadline: 5/1/2015; Opposition due by 5/6/2015) (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-01055-LJO-SAB ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 On July 9, 2013, Plaintiffs Arthur D. Jackson, Leonard M. Lujan, Marcus Jackson, 18 Rodney Taylor, Lacedric Johnson, L.T. Belton, and Norman Johnson filed this class action on 19 behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. On March 24, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a 20 second amended complaint. On February 2, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on 21 the pleadings. A hearing on the motion was held on April 29, 2015, during which the Court 22 granted Plaintiffs’ request to provide supplemental briefing on the issue of whether Plaintiffs 23 have standing to bring claims against Beard and Brazelton, Plaintiffs Ljuan, Taylor, and Belton 24 have standing to bring claims against Brown, and Plaintiffs A. Jackson, M. Jackson, and L. 25 Johnson have standing to bring claims against Hartley in response to Defendants’ reply brief. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 Plaintiff shall file their supplemental brief addressing the standing issue on or before May 1, 2015; 1 1 2. Defendants shall file their opposition on or before May 6, 2015; and 2 3. The matter shall be deemed submitted upon the filing of Defendants’ opposition brief. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: April 30, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?