Jackson et al v. State of California et al

Filing 54

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the hearing on 44 Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS Second Amended Complaint from 6/25/2014 to 7/9/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Plaintiff's opposition brief is due on 6/20/2014 and defendants' reply is due on 7/2/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/6/2014. (Hernandez, M)

5

Mark A. Ozzello (CSB #116595)
Suzy E. Lee (CSB #271120)
ARIAS, OZZELLO & GIGNAC, LLP
6701 Center Drive West, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California 90045
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

1
2
3
4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

ARTHUR D. JACKSON, an individual;
LEONARD M. LUJAN, an individual;
MARCUS JACKSON, an individual;
RODNEY TAYLOR, an individual;
LACEDRIC JOHNSON, an individual;
L.T. BELTON, an individual; NORMAN
JOHNSON, an individual, on behalf of
themselves and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page

vs.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a Public
Entity; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.,
GOVERNOR; CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION (“CDCR”), a
Public Entity; MATTHEW CATE,
SECRETARY CDCR; JEFFREY
BEARD, SECRETARY CDCR; P.D.
BRAZELTON; WARDEN PLEASANT
VALLEY STATE PRISON; JAMES D.
HARTLEY, WARDEN AVENAL
STATE PRISON; CALIFORNIA
CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE
SERVICES (“CCHCS”); and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01055-LJOSAB
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE THE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND EXTEND
THE BRIEFING PERIOD ON
THE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS

1

WHEREAS, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Second Amended

2

Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (“Motion”) is set to be heard on June 25, 2014;

3

WHEREAS, the parties wish to continue the hearing on the Motion and

4
5
6

modify the briefing schedule on the opposition and reply briefs;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to approval of
the Court, that:

7

1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion be continued to July 9, 2014;

8

2. Plaintiffs’ opposition brief be due on June 20, 2014; and

9

3. Defendants’ reply brief be due on July 2, 2014.

10
11
12

Dated: June 5, 2013

ARIAS OZZELLO & GIGNAC LLP

13
14

By: /s/ Suzy E. Lee
MARK A. OZZELLO
SUZY E. LEE
ARIAS, OZZELLO & GIGNAC,
LLP

15
16
17
18

IAN WALLACH
JASON K. FELDMAN
FELDMAN & WALLACH

19

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: June 5, 2013
By: /s/ David E. Brice
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
JAY C. RUSSELL
Supervising Deputy Attorney
General
JON S. ALLIN
DAVID E. BRICE
Deputy Attorneys General

28
Page

Page 1

JAY C. RU

Supervisin

1
2
3
4

ORDER
The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause
appearing orders as follows:
1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion shall be continued to July 9,

5

2014 at 10:00 a.m.

6

2. Plaintiffs’ opposition brief be due on June 20, 2014; and

7

3. Defendants’ reply brief be due on July 2, 2014.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 6, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page

Page 1