Swan v. San Joaquin Valley College, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/21/2013. Non-Expert Discovery now due by 5/15/2014; Expert Disclosures due by 6/1/2014; Supplemental Expert Disclosures due by 6/30/2014; Expert Discovery due by 7/15/2014. All other dates remain as previously set.(Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT

10

DANIEL SWAN,
Plaintiff,

12
SANTA MO NI CA

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

13

vs.

14

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
COLLEGE, INC., a California
corporation, MELISSA GRIMSLEY,
an individual, KERRIE LILES, an
individual, and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-01073 LJO GSA
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
Complaint Filed:

June 3, 2013

ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

19), and good cause appearing therefor, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1.

The Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff shall be May 15, 2014 (instead of

April 1, 2014, as originally scheduled).
2.

Expert Disclosures shall be made by June 1, 2014 (instead of May 1,

2014, as originally scheduled);
3.

Supplemental Expert Disclosures shall be made by June 30, 2014

(instead of May 15, 2014, as originally scheduled);
4.

The Expert Discovery Cutoff shall be July 15, 2014 (instead of July 1,

2014, as originally scheduled).

12
SANTA MO NI CA

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order (Doc.

5.

All other dates set forth in the Scheduling Order are unchanged.

13

6.

During the leave of absence of Defendant, Melissa Grimsley, from her

14

employment with Defendant, San Joaquin Valley College, Inc., all discovery is

15

stayed. Defendants shall have 21 days from the date of Ms. Grimsley’s return to

16

respond to any outstanding written discovery (so long as Ms. Grimsley’s return is

17

within one week of the scheduled return date of February 27, 2014, i.e., by March

18

6, 2014). If Ms. Grimsley does not return to work at SJVC by March 6, 2014,

19

counsel for Defendants shall promptly meet and confer with Plaintiff’s counsel,

20

and, if the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the parties shall first attempt to

21

resolve any dispute through an informal telephonic hearing before the Court

22

(Magistrate Judge Gary Austin).

23

7.

Notwithstanding the stay referenced in Paragraph 7, above, the parties

24

agree to discuss informally producing, to the extent possible without the input of

25

Ms. Grimsley, limited electronically stored information (“ESI”). This informal

26

document production is without prejudice to the right of Plaintiff to move to

27

compel further production at a later date, after service of written discovery

28

responses, and without prejudice to the right of Defendants to produce additional
2

1

documents and/or move for a protective order with regard to such document

2

requests and production of documents, subject to the Local Rules of this Court as

3

well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

4
5
6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

November 21, 2013

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

6i0kij8d

12
SANTA MO NI CA

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP

11

Dated:

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3