Arizpe v. United States of America et al
Filing
2
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Central District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/22/2013. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OMAR ARIZPE,
12
1:13-cv-01085 GSA (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
vs.
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
15
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
/
Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens
vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity
20
jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants
21
reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions
22
giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action
23
is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in
24
which the action may otherwise be brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
25
In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. The claim arose at the Federal
26
Correctional Institution in Lompoc, California, located in Santa Barbara County, which is in the
27
Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff’s claim should have been filed in the United
28
States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court
-1-
1
may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a);
2
Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
3
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States
District Court for the Central District of California.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
220hhe
July 22, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?