Gollubier v. Ybarra, et al.
Filing
12
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/09/14. Fifteen-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DERECK GOLLUBIER,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
GILBERT YBARRA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01090-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
[ECF No. 11]
Plaintiff Dereck Gollubier is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On March 7, 2014, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that he stated a
20
cognizable excessive force and assault and battery claims against Defendants Gilbert Ybarra and K.
21
Oliver. The Court granted Plaintiff the option of filing an amended complaint or proceeding on the
22
claim found to be cognizable. On April 7, 2014, Plaintiff notified the Court of his intent to proceed
23
only on the claims found to be cognizable.
24
On April 14, 2014, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete and submit a Notice of Submission
25
of Documents, provide one completed Summons for each defendant, one USM-285 form for each
26
defendant, and two copies of the complaint within thirty days of the date of service. (ECF No. 11.)
27
The thirty day time frame has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to file these documents and without
28
them the United States Marshal cannot serve the defendants in this action.
1
1
2
Accordingly, within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order Plaintiff is ordered
to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 9, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?