Holcomb v. Ramar et al

Filing 27

ORDER VACATING Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/29/2014. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HARVEY HOLCOMB, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. 13 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO JERRY RAMAR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 16, 2013, the Court issued a Scheduling Order setting a settlement 18 conference on September 4, 2014. (ECF No. 22.) The Scheduling Order stated that “[a]t least 19 five (5) court days prior to the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to 20 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone chambers by e-mail to saborders@caed.uscourts.gov, a 21 Confidential Settlement Conference Statement.” (Scheduling Order 7:1-3.) The Scheduling 22 Order further stated that: 23 24 25 As far in advance of the settlement conference as possible, a party shall inform the Court and other parties that it believes the case is not in a settlement posture so the Court may vacate or reset the settlement conference. Otherwise the parties shall proceed with the settlement conference in good faith to attempt to resolve all or part of the case. 26 27 (Scheduling Order 7:23-8:1.) 28 / / / 1 1 Defendants submitted a confidential settlement conference statement on August 27, 2014. 2 However, Plaintiff did not submit a confidential settlement conference statement. On August 29, 3 2014, the Court contacted Plaintiff’s counsel by e-mail, indicating that the settlement conference 4 would be vacated if Plaintiff’s confidential settlement conference statement was not filed by 2:00 5 p.m. A minute was issued regarding the same. Plaintiff responded by e-mailing the courtroom 6 deputy at 1:16 p.m. informing the Court that Plaintiff no longer believes the case is ready for 7 settlement and the parties would file a stipulation to modify the scheduling order. 8 This Court spends considerable time preparing for settlement conference so as to make it 9 meaningful to the parties and results in a greater likelihood of settlement success. Settlement is 10 extremely important in this district where the judges have one of the highest caseloads per judge 11 in the United States. The settlement conference statement assists the Court in adequately 12 preparing for these matters. They are not pro forma. Additionally, the settlement conferences 13 are calendared by the Court and reserved for the sole purpose of conducting that conference 14 which denies other parties an opportunity to have matters heard during that time by this Court. 15 Scheduling is not taken lightly by judges in this court, nor should it by counsel. 16 Due to Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely settlement conference statement, the Court will 17 vacate the settlement conference scheduled for September 4. Should the parties desire another 18 settlement conference date, they shall confer and contact the courtroom deputy with available 19 dates. However, no settlement conference shall be set until Plaintiff submits a meaningful 20 confidential settlement statement to the Court. 21 Moreover, to the extent that Defendants have incurred unnecessary costs as a result of 22 preparing to appear at the settlement conference, the Court will entertain a motion for 23 reimbursement of costs. Defendants shall file and notice any such motion on or before 24 September 12, 2014. 25 Based upon the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The settlement conference scheduled for September 4, 2014 is VACATED; 27 2. The Court will reset the settlement conference only upon the filing of a 28 meaningful settlement conference statement by Plaintiff and at a time convenient 2 to all parties and the Court; and 1 3. 2 If Defendants desire to recover any unnecessary costs incurred to prepare for the settlement conference, a motion shall be filed on or before September 12, 2014. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?