Holcomb v. Ramar et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION and ORDER for CONTINUANCE OF DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND EXPERT DISCLOSURE. The scheduled is modified as follows: Non-Expert Discovery deadline reset to 7/1/2015; Expert Disclosure deadline reset to 7/13/2015; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure deadline reset to 7/24/2015. No other scheduling deadlines are modified. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/14/2015. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HARVEY HOLCOMB, Case No: 13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 JERRY RAMAR, a Modesto police officer; OFFICER KROUTIL, a Modesto police officer; 14 OFFICER COX, a Modesto police officer; OFFICER BOTTOMS, a Modesto police officer; OFFICER CICCARELLI, a Modesto 15 police officer; J. CHANDLER, a Modesto police officer; JOHN DOE and RICHARD 16 ROE, Modesto police officers, the true names and exact numbers of whom are unknown at this 17 time; CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation, 18 Defendants. 19 STIPULATION REQUESTING BRIEF CONTINUANCE OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND EXPERT DISCLOSURE ONLY; ORDER THEREON 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2440306.1 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND EXPERT DISCLOSURE; ORDER THEREON [13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO] 1 2 PARTIES The parties to this Stipulation are Plaintiff HARVEY HOLCOMB (“Plaintiff” or 3 “Holcomb”) and Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, JERRY RAMAR, JAIME COX, BEN 4 KROUTIL, JOSEPH BOTTOMS, TOM CICCARELLI and JEANNE CHANDLER 5 (“Defendants”), collectively, (“Parties”). 6 RECITALS 7 WHEREAS, the Parties have been working cooperatively to complete the necessary 8 discovery by the current deadline of June 12, 2016. But, intervening trial that begins on June 9, 9 2015, will make that difficult. Accordingly, the parties are requesting a brief continuance of the 10 discovery cut-off from June 16, 2015 to July 1, 2015. The parties are also requesting an extension 11 of the current deadline for expert disclosure from June 26, 2015 to July 13, 2015. The Parties are 12 not requesting that any other deadlines be continued and do not believe that the brief extensions 13 requested will interfere in anyway with the current deadline for filing dispositive motions or the 14 trial date of January 12, 2016. 15 16 STIPULATION 17 WHEREFORE, the Parties agree and stipulate as follows: 18 1. The Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the discovery cut-off in this 19 matter from June 12, 2015 to July 1, 2015. 20 2. The parties are also requesting an extension of the current deadline for expert 21 disclosure from June 26, 2015 to July 13, 2015. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 23 24 DATED: May 14, 2015 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 25 26 By: 27 28 /S/ Blake P. Loebs Blake P. Loebs Kevin P. McLaughlin Attorney for Defendants 1 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND EXPERT DISCLOSURE; ORDER THEREON [13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO] 2440306.1 1 DATED: May 14, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY BOSKOVICH 2 3 By: 4 5 6 /S/ Anthony Boskovich Anthony Boskovich Attorney for Plaintiff HARVEY HOLCOMB ORDER 7 The parties have requested a schedule modification to continue the non-expert discovery 8 9 deadline and the deadline to disclose experts. The parties have not requested a modification to the 10 rebuttal expert disclosure deadline, which would occur, under the proposed schedule, before the 11 modified deadline to disclose experts. As such, the Court modifies the schedule pursuant to the 12 parties' stipulation and further modifies the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosure. The schedule is 13 modified as follows: 14 Event 15 Modified Deadline Current Deadline 16 1. Non-Expert Discovery July 1, 2015 June 12, 2015 17 2. Expert Disclosure July 13, 2015 June 26, 2015 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure July 24, 2015 July 10, 2015 18 3. 19 20 No other scheduling deadlines are modified. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 14, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND EXPERT DISCLOSURE; ORDER THEREON [13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO] 2440306.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?