Holcomb v. Ramar et al

Filing 49

ORDER EXTENDING Discovery Deadlines. The discovery schedule is modified as follows: Designation of Expert Reports due by 9/4/2015. Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports due by 9/18/2015. Expert Discovery Cutoff 10/2/2015. Non-Dispositive Motion filing deadline 8/24/2015. Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing deadline 9/23/2015. All other dates remain as set. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/10/2015. (Timken, A)

1 Anthony Boskovich, No. 121198
Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich
2 28 N. First Street, 6th Floor
San Jose, California 95113-1210
3 [phone]
[e-mail]
4
Attorney for plaintiff HARVEY HOLCOMB
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

HARVEY HOLCOMB,

12
13

Case No. 1:13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY
DEADLINES

v.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

JERRY RAMAR, a Modesto police officer;
OFFICER KROUTIL, a Modesto police
officer; OFFICER COX, a Modesto police
officer; OFFICER BOTTOMS, a Modesto
police officer; OFFICER CICCARELLI, a
Modesto police officer; J. CHANGLER, a
Modesto police officer; JOHN DOE and
RICHARD ROE, Modesto police officers, the
true names and exact numbers of whom are
unknown at this time; CITY OF MODESTO, a
municipal corporation,

21
22

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

23
PARTIES

24
25

The parties to this Stipulation are Plaintiff HARVEY HOLCOMB (“Plaintiff” or

26 “Holcomb”) and Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, JERRY RAMAR, JAIME COX, BEN
27 KROUTIL,

JOSEPH

BOTTOMS,

28 (“Defendants”), collectively, (“Parties”).

TOM

CICCARELLI

and

JEANNE

CHANDLER

1
2

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties have been working cooperatively to complete the necessary

3 discovery and expert disclosures by the current deadline of August 15, 2015. The deposition of
4 Officer Ramar, the principal defendant in this matter, had to be postponed until August 12. 2015
5 due to illness. Accordingly, the parties are requesting a brief continuance of the expert disclosures
6 and discovery deadlines as set forth below. The Parties are not requesting that the dispositive
7 motions date, pretrial conference, or trial be continued and do not believe that the brief extension
8 requested will interfere in any way with the trial date of January 12, 2016.
9
10

STIPULATION
WHEREFORE, the Parties agree and stipulate that the scheduling order be amended as

11 follows:
12

CURRENT DATE

PROPOSED DATE

Designation of Experts with
Reports

15 August 2015

4 September 2015

15

Designation of Rebuttal
Experts with Reports

28 August 2015

18 September 2015

16

Expert Discovery Cutoff

11 September 2015

2 October 2015

17

Deadline for Filing Expert
Discovery Motions

See Civ. Loc. Rule 251

See Civ. Loc. Rule 251

13
14

18

19 All other dates remain as set.
20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

22
23 Dated: 5 August 2015

/s/ Anthony Boskovich______________________
ANTHONY BOSKOVICH
Attorney for Plaintiff, Harvey Holcomb

24
25
26 Dated: August 5, 2015
By:
27
28

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
/s/ Blake P. Loebs________________
BLAKE P. LOEBS
Attorneys for Defendants

2

1
2

ORDER
Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS the discovery schedule is modified as follows:

3

5
6

NEW DEADLINE

Designation of Experts with
Reports

August 15, 2015

September 4, 2015

Designation of Rebuttal
Experts with Reports

August 28, 2015

September 18, 2015

Expert Discovery Cutoff

4

CURRENT DEADLINE

September 11, 2015

October 2, 2015

Non-Dispositive Motion
Filing Deadline

August 12, 2015

August 24, 2015

Non-Dispositive Motion
Hearing Deadline

September 9, 2015

September 23, 2015

7
8
9
10
11
12 All other dates remain as set.
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 10, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3