Taylor v. FedEx Freight, Inc.

Filing 65

ORDER UNSEALING Motion for Preliminary Approval re 64 Stipulation signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/1/2016. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

ROY D. TAYLOR, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

13

16

ORDER UNSEALING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

v.

14
15

No. 1:13-cv-01137-DAD-BAM

FEDEX FREIGHT, INC., an Arkansas
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

(Doc. No. 64)

Defendants.

17
18

On February 24, 2016, defendant filed an unopposed request to seal plaintiff’s motion for

19
20

preliminary approval of a class action settlement until the issuance by the court of an order

21

granting preliminary approval. (Doc. No. 56.) On February 29, 2016, the motion for preliminary

22

approval was filed and on March 1, 2016, the court granted the request to seal the motion “until

23

further order of the court.” (Doc. Nos. 57 and 58.) On April 20, 2016, the court issued the order

24

granting preliminary approval of the class action settlement. (Doc. No. 63.) On April 29, 2016,

25

the parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order unsealing the motion for preliminary

26

approval. (Doc. No. 64.)

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

The court, having read the parties stipulation and proposed order, finds good cause to now

2

unseal the motion for preliminary approval. According, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary

3

approval (Doc. No. 57) is hereby unsealed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the

4

unredacted version of that motion in the public docket.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

May 1, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2