Curtis v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, et al.
Filing
35
ORDER (Amend the Scheduling Order Doc. 21): (1) Non-Expert Discovery by 6/15/2014. (2) Expert Disclosures by 7/1/2014. (3) Rebuttal Expert Disclosures by 7/8/2014. (4) Expert Discovery by 8/26/2014. The Dispositive Motion, Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial dates will remain as set in the December 23, 2013 Scheduling Order. (Doc. 21). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/30/2014. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS,
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1: 13-cv-01150-BAM
vs.
14
WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS
TRUST, AND WAL-MART STORES,
INC.
15
Defendants.
13
/
16
17
On December 23, 2013, the Court issued an order setting trial and discovery deadlines in this
18
case. (Doc. 21). A discovery dispute arose and on April 29, 2014, the Court held an informal
19
discovery conference. During the discussion with counsel the parties argued as to whether Plaintiff’s
20
interrogatories as phrased exceeded the numerical limit on interrogatories permitted under Federal
21
Rule of Civil Procedure 33. Finding that a good faith dispute had arisen as to the interpretation of
22
discovery, the Court orally agreed to amend the scheduling order.
23
24
Accordingly, the Court, having considered the arguments of counsel at the informal discovery
conference, finds that good cause exists to continue the discovery deadlines to the following dates:
25
1.
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff:
June 15, 2014
26
2.
Expert Disclosures:
July 1, 2014
27
3.
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures:
July 8, 2014
28
1
1
2
3
4.
Expert Discovery Cutoff:
August 26, 2014
The Dispositive Motion, Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial dates will remain as set in the
December 23, 2013 Scheduling Order. (Doc. 21).
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
April 30, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?