Damron v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER to DISMISS Plaintiff's Claims with Prejudice, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/13/14. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Wanger Jones Helsley PC Jay A. Christofferson #203878 jchristofferson@wjhattorneys.com 265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 233-4800 Facsimile: (559) 233-9330 Attorneys for Plaintiff TONI DAMRON 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 TONI DAMRON 11 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:13-CV-01160-LJO-SAB Plaintiff(s), STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive Defendant(s). 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {7461/002/00487736.DOCX} PROOF OF SERVICE 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their 2 respective counsel, that the above-entitled action be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE as to 3 Defendant, C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 4 Procedure 41(a)(1) 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: August 8, 2014 WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC 7 8 By: /s/ Jay A. Christofferson _________________ Jay A. Christofferson Attorneys for TONI DAMRON 9 10 11 Dated: August 8, 2014 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 12 By: /s/ D. Joshua Salinas ____________________ Robert B. Milligan D. Joshua Salinas Attorneys for C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 Based upon this Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is 18 19 20 21 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant, C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. All parties are to bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: August 13, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 {7461/002/00487736.DOCX} PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?