Damron v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER to DISMISS Plaintiff's Claims with Prejudice, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/13/14. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
Wanger Jones Helsley PC
Jay A. Christofferson #203878
jchristofferson@wjhattorneys.com
265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone:
(559) 233-4800
Facsimile:
(559) 233-9330
Attorneys for Plaintiff TONI DAMRON
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
FRESNO DIVISION
9
10
TONI DAMRON
11
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:13-CV-01160-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff(s),
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Defendant(s).
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{7461/002/00487736.DOCX}
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their
2
respective counsel, that the above-entitled action be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE as to
3
Defendant, C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
4
Procedure 41(a)(1)
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated: August 8, 2014
WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC
7
8
By: /s/ Jay A. Christofferson _________________
Jay A. Christofferson
Attorneys for TONI DAMRON
9
10
11
Dated: August 8, 2014
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
12
By: /s/ D. Joshua Salinas ____________________
Robert B. Milligan
D. Joshua Salinas
Attorneys for C.H. ROBINSON
WORLDWIDE, INC.
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
Based upon this Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is
18
19
20
21
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant, C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
All parties are to bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated:
August 13, 2014
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
{7461/002/00487736.DOCX}
PROOF OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?