Hammond v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al

Filing 156

ORDER Directing the Clerk to Close the Action Based Upon the Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss this Action With Prejudice 155 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/1/17. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEMOND HAMMOND,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

v.
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING
CORPORATION,

15

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-1209-AWI- JLT
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE
THE ACTION BASED UPON THE PARTIES’
STIPULATION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
(Doc. 155)

16
17

On October 30, 2017, Plaintiff Demond Hammond and Defendant Management & Training

18

Corporation stipulated to dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. 155) Pursuant to Rule 41 of the

19

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing …

20

a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

21

Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 155), it

22

“automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

23

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 1, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE