Ledesma v. Adame et al

Filing 36

ORDER SETTING CONFERENCE Regarding Setting of an Evidentiary Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/18/2017. Telephonic Conference set for 5/3/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSE LEDESMA, 11 1:13-cv-01227-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 ORDER SETTING CONFERENCE REGARDING SETTING OF AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ECF NO. 30) ADAME, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 On February 3, 2017, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment under Federal 17 Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 30). On 18 April 10, 2017, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 35). 19 After reviewing the evidence, the Court has determined that there is a dispute of fact and that an 20 Albino evidentiary hearing is necessary. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir. 21 2014). Accordingly, the Court will set a conference regarding the setting of an evidentiary 22 hearing. 23 evidentiary hearing. The parties should also be prepared to discuss the procedures and scope of the 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. A conference regarding the setting of an evidentiary hearing is set before Magistrate 26 Judge Erica P. Grosjean on May 3, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. at the Robert E. Coyle Federal 27 Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721 in Courtroom #10; and 28 1 1 2. Plaintiff must appear telephonically. Defendants’ counsel may either appear in person 2 or telephonically. To appear telephonically, the parties are directed to use the 3 following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 18, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?