Ledesma v. Adame et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION and ORDER to extend time for Plaintiff's opposition and Defendants' reply to Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's third amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/2/2018. Opposition due by 1/25/2018; Reply due by 2/18/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DAN SIEGEL, SBN 56400
EMILYROSE JOHNS, SBN 294319
SIEGEL, YEE & BRUNNER
475 14th Street, Suite 500
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE LEDESMA

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JOSE LEDESMA,
Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

ADAME, ET AL.,

14

Defendants.

15
16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:13-cv-01227-AWI-EPG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS’
OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANTS’
REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants filed Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

19

Third Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in the above-

20

captioned matter on December 21, 2017 (ECF No. 59). Based on the date of the motion’s

21

filing, Plaintiff’s Opposition is due January 4, 2018, and Defendants’ Reply is due

22

January 11, 2018. No hearing was initially scheduled in this matter as Plaintiff was pro

23

per until December 21, 2017, when counsel EmilyRose Johns entered an appearance on

24

his behalf.

25

The extension is requested to allow plaintiff’s counsel the opportunity to meet

26

with plaintiff and discuss the contents of the motion. This is requested because plaintiff

27

is incarcerated with attendant limitations on his ability to freely communicate with

28
Ledesma v. Adame et al., No. 1:13-cv-01227-AWI-EPG
Stipulation and Order - 1

1
2

counsel and because plaintiff’s counsel has newly appeared in this matter.
The parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court grant the

3

Plaintiffs an extension to file their opposition and the Defendants an extension to file

4

their reply.

5

The parties stipulate to and respectfully request the following dates:

6

-

Plaintiff’s Opposition due January 25, 2018

7

-

Defendants’ Reply due February 15, 2018

8
9

Dated: December 29, 2017

10

SIEGEL, YEE & BRUNNER

11
By: _/s/ EmilyRose Johns_______
EmilyRose Johns

12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE LEDESMA

14
15
16
17

Dated: December 29, 2017
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California

18
19
20
21
22

By: __/s/ Colin A. Shaff_________
Colin A. Shaff
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
G. ADAME, J. LUNDY, and J. TYREE

23
24
25
26
27
28
Ledesma v. Adame et al., No. 1:13-cv-01227-AWI-EPG
Stipulation and Order - 2

ORDER

1
2

On stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, the Court grants the

3

parties’ stipulated extension. Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is

4

due January 25, 2018. Defendants’ Reply is due February 18, 2018.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated:

January 2, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ledesma v. Adame et al., No. 1:13-cv-01227-AWI-EPG
Stipulation and Order - 3