Cortinas v. Gipson et al
Filing
27
ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's 26 Reply to Answer, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/7/14. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
CONNIE GIPSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY
TO ANSWER
[ECF No. 26]
Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the
19
jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on August 19, 2013. Local Rule 302.
20
This action is proceeding against Defendant Portillo for excessive force in violation of the
21
Eighth Amendment, and against Defendants Chief Deputy Warden S. Johnson, LaFleur, Moreno,
22
Kerber, and A. Johnson for failure to protect and intervene in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
23
24
On May 21, 2014, Defendants S. Johnson, A. Johnson, Moreno, and Portillo filed an answer to
the complaint.
25
On August 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s answer.
26
Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows:
27
There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as
such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party
28
1
complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions
of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other
pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a
third-party answer.
1
2
3
4
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Because the Court did not order Plaintiff to reply to answer, Plaintiff’s response
5
is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
August 7, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?