Cortinas v. Gipson et al

Filing 27

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's 26 Reply to Answer, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/7/14. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO ANSWER [ECF No. 26] Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the 19 jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on August 19, 2013. Local Rule 302. 20 This action is proceeding against Defendant Portillo for excessive force in violation of the 21 Eighth Amendment, and against Defendants Chief Deputy Warden S. Johnson, LaFleur, Moreno, 22 Kerber, and A. Johnson for failure to protect and intervene in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 23 24 On May 21, 2014, Defendants S. Johnson, A. Johnson, Moreno, and Portillo filed an answer to the complaint. 25 On August 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s answer. 26 Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows: 27 There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party 28 1 complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer. 1 2 3 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Because the Court did not order Plaintiff to reply to answer, Plaintiff’s response 5 is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 August 7, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?