Cortinas v. Gipson et al

Filing 68

ORDER VACATING May 19, 2015, Evidentiary Hearing and Rescheduling Hearing to May 26, 2015, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/2/15. (Evidentiary Hearing set for 5/26/2015 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. M. PORTILLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER VACATING MAY 19, 2015, EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND RESCHEDULING HEARING TO MAY 26, 2015 Date: May 26, 2015 Time: 1:00 p.m. Honorable Stanley A. Boone, Courtroom 9 Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Due to a scheduling conflict, the instant case set for evidentiary hearing on May 19, 2015, at 19 20 1:00 p.m. is VACATED and rescheduled to May 26, 2015, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9, Sixth Floor 21 of the United States Courthouse in Fresno, California. As stated in the Court’s March 4, 2015, order the hearing will commence and be completed 22 23 that afternoon, and will be limited to the following issues relating to exhaustion of the administrative 24 remedies: (1) whether Plaintiff’s inmate appeal number CSPC-5-12-1100 was improperly rejected at 25 the second level of review for Plaintiff’s failure to participate in the interview process; and (2) if 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 improperly rejected, whether Plaintiff received the letter dated July 30, 2012, informing him that his 2 appeal was cancelled at the second level of review for failure to cooperate. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 April 2, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?