Cortinas v. Gipson et al
Filing
75
ORDER VACATING May 26, 2015, Evidentiary Hearing and RESCHEDULING Evidentiary Hearing to May 13, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/9/15. (Evidentiary Hearing set for 5/13/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
M. PORTILLO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER VACATING MAY 26, 2015,
EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND
RESCHEDULING HEARING TO
MAY 13, 2015
Date: May 13, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Honorable Stanley A. Boone, Courtroom 9
Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Due to a scheduling conflict, the instant case set for evidentiary hearing on May 26, 2015, at
19
20
1:00 p.m. is VACATED and rescheduled to May 13, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9, Sixth Floor
21
of the United States Courthouse in Fresno, California.
As stated in the Court’s March 4, 2015, order the hearing will commence and be completed
22
23
that afternoon, and will be limited to the following issues relating to exhaustion of the administrative
24
remedies: (1) whether Plaintiff’s inmate appeal number CSPC-5-12-1100 was improperly rejected at
25
the second level of review for Plaintiff’s failure to participate in the interview process; and (2) if
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
improperly rejected, whether Plaintiff received the letter dated July 30, 2012, informing him that his
2
appeal was cancelled at the second level of review for failure to cooperate.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
April 9, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?