Goins et al v. County of Merced et al

Filing 94

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Ex Parte 92 Motion for Continuance, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/24/2016. ( 90 Motion for Summary Judgment previously set for 3/15/2016, is CONTINUED to 4/5/2016, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. The parties are directed to file any opposition or reply briefs in connection with that motion in accordance with Local Rule 230. All other deadlines in this case shall remain unchanged. (Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

DIANE GOINS and WESLEY
RENTFROW,
Plaintiffs,

13
v.

14
15

COUNTY OF MERCED,

No. 1:13-cv-01245-DAD-SKO

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
(Doc. No. 92)

Defendants.

16
17

Before the court is an ex parte motion for a continuance, brought on behalf of plaintiffs

18
19

Diane Goins and Wesley Rentfrow, of the hearing on defendants’ motion for partial summary

20

judgment/adjudication. (Doc. No. 92.) Having considered plaintiff’s ex parte motion and finding

21

good cause, the court will grant the motion.
The hearing on defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment/adjudication is hereby

22
23

continued to April 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5. The parties are directed to file any

24

opposition or reply briefs in connection with that motion in accordance with Local Rule 230. All

25

other deadlines in this case shall remain unchanged.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated:

February 24, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1