Werner v. Advance Newhouse Partnership, LLC et al
Filing
9
ORDER ; DENYING as moot 8 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/9/2013. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01259 - LJO – JLT
)
Plaintiff,
) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
v.
)
ADVANCE NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, )
)
LLC, a New York limited liability company
)
d/b/a BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS; and
)
BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS,
)
)
Defendants.
)
PATRICIA WERNER,
18
19
On September 24, 2013, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause to Plaintiff Patricia Werner
20
(“Plaintiff”) for her failure to file an amended complaint, which was due no later than September 18,
21
2013. (Doc. 5). However, the same date the Clerk of Court indicated Plaintiff filed her First Amended
22
Complaint on September 23, 2013. Therefore, the Court discharged the order to show cause, and
23
informed Plaintiff that no response to the Court’s order to show cause was necessary. (Doc. 6).
24
On October 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the Court’s order to show
25
cause. (Doc. 8). Specifically, she “requests that the Court allow this matter to continue and consider
26
her First Amended Complaint timely filed.” Id. at 2 (emphasis omitted). Because the Court discharged
27
the order to show cause, the issue is moot. Moreover, the Court has since treated Plaintiff’s First
28
Amended Complaint as timely, and reviewed it for cognizable claims on October 7, 2013. (Doc. 7)
1
1
The Court determined Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for a violation of the Equal Pay Act,
2
and has informed Plaintiff the action may proceed in this claim in her First Amended Complaint, or she
3
may elect to file a Second Amended Complaint. Id. Consequently, Plaintiff has received the relief
4
requested, and the motion for reconsideration is DENIED AS MOOT.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 9, 2013
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?