Van Buren v. Willard et al
Filing
61
ORDER DENYING Defendant's Motion to Strike Surreply 51 ; ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to Respond to Surreply, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/27/15: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
IRVIN VAN BUREN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
EMERSON,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:13-cv-01273-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STRIKE SURREPLY
(Document 51)
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO SURREPLY
16
Plaintiff Irvin Van Buren (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
17
18
pauperis in this civil rights action. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended
19
Complaint against Defendant Emerson for violation of the Eighth Amendment.
20
21
Defendant’s December 3, 2014, motion for summary judgment based on exhaustion is
pending.
22
23
Plaintiff filed a surreply raising new arguments on January 29, 2015. In the interest of
addressing all relevant issues, the Court ORDERS Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s January
24
25
26
27
28
29, 2015, filing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff is not
permitted to file a reply.
///
///
1
1
Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s surreply is DENIED.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
March 27, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?