Van Buren v. Willard et al

Filing 68

ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion To Modify Discovery And Scheduling Order (Document 67 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/27/2015. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 IRVIN VAN BUREN, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. EMERSON, 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13-cv-01273-LJO-DLB PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER (Document 67) 16 17 Plaintiff Irvin Van Buren (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended 19 Complaint against Defendant Emerson for violation of the Eighth Amendment. 20 21 22 The dispositive motion deadline is currently June 1, 2015. On April 22, 2015, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on exhaustion. 23 On April 24, Defendant filed the instant request to vacate the June 1, 2015, dispositive 24 25 26 motion deadline. The Court deems the matter suitable for decision without an opposition. Local Rule 230(l). 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 DISCUSSION Modification of the pretrial scheduling order requires a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 5 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 6 7 8 9 607 (9th Cir. 1992)). “If the party seeking the modification ‘was not diligent, the inquiry should end’ and the motion to modify should not be granted.” Id. Here, Defendant requests that the Court vacate the June 1, 2015, dispositive motion 10 deadline because of the pending Findings and Recommendations. As the Findings and 11 Recommendations have now issued, the Court will GRANT Defendant’s request. The June 1, 12 2015, dispositive motion deadline is VACATED. The Court will reset a deadline, if necessary, 13 after the action on the Findings and Recommendations. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis April 27, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?